'primary'
So I have noticed these Montana papers coming out with these stories that Montana is one of 23 states without a "primary seat belt law." Well, well, well, thank goodness there are still 23 states that appreciate individual freedom. I can basically tell you that my number one issue in politics, other than national security, is individual freedom. OK, taxes are up there too, but basically civil liberties have the most direct and immediate impact on my life. I just wanted to post this comment from "MT.Jarhead" from GreatFallsTribune.com:
"Yeah Right....When we didn't have any seat belt law they crammed it down our throat saying it would save lives...When we didn't have a speed limit they crammed it down our throat saying it would save lives...When we had a BAC DUI limit of .15 then .10 and now .08 they crammed it down our throat saying it would save lives...When we didn't have an open container law they crammed it down our throat saying it would save lives...Each time they using the chicken sh** exscuse that we might lose Federal funding if we didn't. Last time I saw the statistics, it appears that highway fatalities haven't changed at all!"
There were plenty of other comments from good freedom loving Montanans that basically said they would rather have their freedom than a government that takes the place of parents.
If I had the power to give freedom back to the people of Montana I would. I would love to roll back the seat belt law, roll back the speed limit law, roll back the open container law. What is this, Europe? We're Americans; we can take care of ourselves. We don't need the government to tell us how to live every minute of our lives down to the most minute aspect.
According to an article in the Billings Gazette "seat belt activists" say that it is costing Montanan taxpayers millions of dollars every year. That is probably a debatable issue but even if it is true that is absolutely no reason to take away freedom from people. If you think that Montanans should give up basic personal freedoms to save a couple bucks, then you and I have irreconcilable priority differences. You can't buy my freedom.
Should our legislature really be worrying about a seat belt law? We have drug issues, energy issues, school funding issues, business issues, growth issues, and these people want to enact a seat belt law.
Have faith in the good judgment of Montanans to make their own decision if they want to put a seat belt on or not.
As long as I'm on this point I might as well confront the issue of the police on the roads. Every person I have ever asked always says that police make them feel uncomfortable, scared even, when they drive by. People tense up, heart rates go through the roof, and blood pressure generally increases when people see a policeman driving by. I believe this is because a lot of people have been hit with large fines for petty traffic violations. This is the exact opposite of what should happen. The police should be there to make people safe and feel safe. Giving police the ability to pull someone over for not wearing a seat belt will simply exacerbate this problem.
Why do the police park in hidden areas and wait for the unsuspecting motorist to drive by going five or six miles over the speed limit? Do they not have anything better to do? Obviously not. I can honestly say that in the eleven or twelve countries I've visited, none of them have such aggressive police on the roads. I guess this is one of a very few areas where I think the United States could learn something from the rest of the world.
I don't even want to get started on the issue of unmarked police cars because I will probably have a heart attack since my cholesterol is sky high.
I honestly can't understand why we have more than one policeman in my hometown of Manhattan, Montana. They literally have nothing to worry about but some high school kids vandalizing something. I'd cut their funding and make them stay in the office until somebody calls with a real problem.











